Sunday, December 29, 2013

Tolerance.

MIDDLETOWN — A swastika is drawn on the face of a Jewish child. Jewish children are pelted with coins. They're assaulted and called vile names.
These are among the charges of anti-Semitism in the Pine Bush School District outlined in a nearly 2-year-old lawsuit filed by three parents.
The suit – vigorously contested by Pine Bush – was first reported in December 2012 by the Times Herald-Record and chronicled in November by The New York Times, resulting in state and federal investigations that are ongoing.
A few miles from Pine Bush, bumper stickers with a red slash through a drawing of a Hasidic man show up in Bloomingburg, a village in eastern Sullivan County.
Some residents there are protesting a 396-home development being marketed to Hasidim that is already under construction.
Next to that development, a huge cross rises in a field.
Even though the developers see the stickers and cross as symbols of hate, those against the development say they're not anti-Semitic.
They say they fear the development will overwhelm their village of some 400 and their rural way of life.
Still, questions remain: Is there anti-Semitism in Pine Bush and Bloomingburg?
Can anti-Semitism and anti-Hasidic sentiment be separated?
Can you be anti-Hasidic and not anti-Semitic?
And finally, what, if anything, can be done to ease the tension in these communities?
These were among the questions posed recently to four local religious leaders who were invited to the Times Herald-Record:
Rabbi Joel Schwab of Temple Sinai in Middletown, which has members from Pine Bush;
Pastor Victor Dyman of the Middletown Seventh-day Adventist Church;
Sister Peggy Murphy, professor of religious studies at Mount Saint Mary College in Newburgh, and
Dr. Quazi al Tariq, a founder of the Middletown Islamic Center.
They did not know about the cross in the field.
Here are their answers, condensed for space:

Rabbi Joel Schwab

Can the Pine Bush and Bloomingburg situations be separated?
“The two issues need to be separated. First, the Pine Bush issue isn't just that this shouldn't be happening to Jews. It shouldn't be happening to Muslims, South Asians … . Bullying is happening in every district in Orange County, in the world. The Anti-Defamation League estimates 12 percent of the populations holds anti-Semitic views.”
As for anti-Hasidic sentiment?
“This issue is us-versus-them. It's cultural tension between an insular community that keeps itself isolated from the outside world for cultural and historic reasons. That issue … is more difficult since there isn't a common body of discourse between the communities.”
“Are the people of Bloomingburg anti-Semitic? I don't think so. No more than the general run of the county.”

Pastor Victor Dyman

He first speaks of his own discrimination.
“I grew up in a communist country (the former Soviet Union) where everybody who thought differently, looked differently, was persecuted. As a Seventh-day Adventist, I didn't go to school on Saturday, so I was called into the principal's office on Monday. Kids picked on me. 'Are you a Jew?' they said. 'Are you anti-Christian?' My parents were dragged through the court system. But without encouragement of the adults, it wouldn't take place.”
As for charges of anti Semitism in Pine Bush and/or Bloomingburg?
“This is totally contradictory to basic Christian principal.”
Can the two issues be separated?
“In God's economy, there is no us-versus-them. Every family should be welcomed in our community. They are God's children.”

Sister Peggy Murphy

She, too, speaks of discrimination beyond Pine Bush and Bloomingburg, mentioning a quote she read about an Orange County town: “They didn't want the Chinese.”
“lt's terrifying for me to hear those comments … These are all our brothers and sisters.”
As for anti-Hasidic sentiment?
“Mike Levine (the late Times Herald-Record executive editor) said, 'For many people in Kiryas Joel, the Holocaust happened 15 minutes ago … . There's a fear of losing their children to the secular world … . If people have suffered like that, who am I to say you're wrong for keeping yourselves separate?'”

As for linking Pine Bush and Bloomingburg?
“People (in Bloomingburg) may see (the development) as a violation of their civil rights. It's a separate issue: (They think) a couple of hundred people are coming in and subsuming our village.”

Dr. Quazi al Tariq

Dr. al Tariq, who is also a psychiatrist, repeatedly stressed education.
“The whole thing is tied to education, sensitivity and history. We all come from Adam and Eve. We are all worshipping the same God. Say I have five children. Can a father discriminate against one child?”
Can you separate the anti-Semitism charges in Pine Bush, and the reported anti-Hasidic sentiment in Bloomingburg?
“There are two issues. One, all religions are allowed their freedom, and you have to respect that freedom. You kill one person, you kill all mankind. You have to respect other religions more than you respect yours, so they can respect you.
“Two, in Monroe (home to the Hasidic Village of Kiryas Joel) there is a common fear. A lot of people believe if they (Kiryas Joel) grow bigger and bigger, no other community can enter. They fear it becomes one big colony.”

Finding common ground

At the end of the 90- minute conversation, we asked the religious leaders how tensions in the communities could be eased.

Rabbi Joel Schwab

He pointed to Sullivan County, where official lines of communication have been established between the Hasidic summer community and year-round residents.
He noted that he and other leaders have reached out to the Hasidim in Orange County, with little success.
“It has to be a two-way street. But it's hard. It's hard to get there.”

Dr. Quazi al Tariq

“In every state, there should be a basic curriculum that teaches what other religions are about ... . For my own community, mingling is very important. It is a responsibility on everyone's part. It is a time everyone should work together.”

Pastor Victor Dyman

“Both sides have to reach out a little.”
“Yes,” say Schwab, Murphy and Tariq.

Sister Peggy Murphy

But the last word for a solution to these seemingly unsolvable problems went to Sister Peggy Murphy.
Her suggestion was one all the leaders agreed with.
“Pray,” she said.



Saturday, December 28, 2013

Lesson 1 Master of Discipleship Dec 28- Jan 3


Quarter 1, 2014

Discipleship

The Master of Discipleship

In the beginning God created a perfect, sinless world. Human beings enjoyed the privilege of honoring, worshiping, and following their Creator. Life should have continued thus for eternity.
Satan, however, seduced our first earthly parents, thus robbing humanity of ultimate meaning, purpose, and significance. Rebellion multiplied, infecting the entire planet.
Christ’s sacrifice provided our only hope. Calvary’s redemption offers us freedom and our only escape from insignificance and meaninglessness. Sinful humans were offered liberty, forgiveness, and the opportunity for restoration to their original estate.
God beckons believers everywhere to become heralds of this matchless grace, ambassadors who communicate this divine redemption to those enslaved by Satan, calling them to follow, worship, and praise their Maker. Christ’s example of disciple-making must become the model that believers follow in answering the Great Commission (Matt. 28:1920).
Therefore, the topic of our quarter is discipleship. Though the term has many facets, in this study we will look at discipleship as the process by which we become followers of Jesus and, as such, better soul-winners.
After all, Jesus is every Christian’s example, especially in the work of soul-winning. Is it illogical to suppose that the keys to effective evangelism are discovered in popular psychology, mass-marketing techniques, and elaborate promotional programs rather than in the following of the simple example of Christ?
How did Jesus attract His followers? What can we learn from Christ’s example that would enable us to more effectively lead others to Him? How can we fulfill the Great Commission?
How did Jesus appeal to such diverse groups: the wealthy and the destitute, the religious and the irreligious, the politically powerful and the powerless? How did Jesus unlock callous hearts, inspire hope among outcasts, gently awaken the child’s tender heart, and leap over ethnic and social barriers in order to make disciples? How did He penetrate the fortresses of wealth and power, open the cocoons of spiritually arrogant religious leaders, or revive hope among those fighting terminal illnesses?
These are not merely discussion questions that stimulate intellectual interchange; rather, they are a crucial area of study for Christians whose passionate desire is to follow Jesus’ example of guiding lost sheep to the loving Shepherd.
Paul also challenged believers to follow him as he followed Christ. It is unthinkable that believers in the twenty-first century should accept a lower standard than that which Paul established in the first century.
In the end, following Jesus vastly exceeds the limiting view that discipleship equals methods for correcting aberrant behaviors and habits, however important these changes are. A comprehensive understanding of discipleship is incomplete until it incorporates a passionate desire to follow Jesus and, as a supernatural result, a passionate desire to lead others to Christ, as well.
Or, as we have so eloquently been told: "No sooner does one come to Christ than there is born in his heart a desire to make known to others what a precious friend he has found in Jesus; the saving and sanctifying truth cannot be shut up in his heart. If we are clothed with the righteousness of Christ and are filled with the joy of His indwelling Spirit, we shall not be able to hold our peace. If we have tasted and seen that the Lord is good we shall have something to tell. . . . There will be an intensity of desire to follow in the path that Jesus trod."-Ellen G. White, Steps to Christ, pp. 78, 79.
Thus, our subject for this quarter.
Dan Solís was born in Texas, U.S.A., the grandson of a sharecropper and migrant farm worker. He holds graduate degrees from Andrews University and Reformed Theological Seminary and has served the church as a pastor, conference departmental director, and college professor. He and his wife Cindy, an elementary school teacher, have three adult children serving the Lord in Washington, California, and Tennessee.

Lesson 1December 28-January 3

Disciples and Scripture


SABBATH AFTERNOON
Read for This Week’s Study: Luke 4:1-12Matt. 12:3-8Matt. 5:17-39Luke 24:13-32Acts 1:16-20.
Memory TextSearch the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me (John 5:39).
Using a metal detector purchased from a rummage sale, Englishman Terry Herbert discovered gold-plated Anglo-Saxon weaponry and silver artifacts buried beneath a farmer’s field. The estimated monetary value of the find exceeded 5 million U. S. dollars.
Like someone seeking treasure in a field of dirt, rocks, and rubbish, we must be careful not to let things get in our way and make us miss the real treasure above: Jesus Christ. Searching for eternal riches, Pharisees and Sadducees alike excavatedthe ancient sacred writings. Ironically, their treasure map, Scripture, had been so radically misread that they missed the point, Jesus, completely.
Explicitly and implicitly Jesus incorporated Scripture into His disciple-making methodology. The ultimate treasure questwas rooted in the prophetic writings, which pointed to Him. Thus, to miss Jesus is to miss the mark. All this means, then, is that all our disciple-making endeavors must, ultimately, be about Jesus and that which He has done for us.
SundayDecember 29

Jesus and the Bible

Because Jesus is the example for all believers, His level of commitment to Scripture becomes more than a matter of passing interest.
Read Luke 4:1-12 and 16-21. What do these passages suggest about Christ’s attitude toward the Bible?


The narrative of Christ’s wilderness temptations shows that, by quoting Scripture, Jesus rebuffed every satanic challenge and invitation. The scrolls were not likely available to Christ during this forty-day desert sojourn. This clearly indicates that Christ had committed substantial portions of Scripture to memory. While the Scriptures quoted in the wilderness were taken from the writings of Moses, Jesus elsewhere quotes from the other parts of the Hebrew Scriptures (Matt. 21:4222:44). Clearly, Christ had a widespread knowledge of Scripture.
Notice, however, that Christ understands that the Scriptures are more than just a tool for overcoming temptation and achieving personal holiness. Jesus recognizes that Scripture points to Him. During the synagogue visit recorded in Luke 4:16-30, Jesus quotes Isaiah then declares that this text points to Himself as the One anointed to release the oppressed and proclaim freedom. Jesus understood that He fulfilled Messianic prophecy. Thus, Jesus not only understood that the Bible pointed to Him, but early on in His ministry He used the Bible to point others to Him, as well.
Though it’s important to know the Bible, that alone isn’t enough. Some of the biggest-name Bible scholars have not even been believing Christians. Thus, we need to ask ourselves, How can we make sure that our study and reading of the Bible helps us to come to a better knowledge of Jesus and that which He had done for us? That is, how can we make Bible study something that transforms our lives?


MondayDecember 30

The Authority of Scripture

Read the following texts. What do they tell us about the way in which Jesus viewed the Bible? Matt. 5:17-20,12:3-815:3-11John 10:34-3717:14-19Luke 24:44.


Whenever Christ debated with the religious authorities, He relied not on abstract philosophy, not even on personal authority, but on the teachings of Scripture. When determining right from wrong, Jesus based His argument on a scriptural bedrock. When opponents challenged Christ’s doctrinal purity, He directed them to specific passages within Scripture. When considering practical matters, Jesus referred listeners to divine revelation. Christ understood that His divinely ordained mission was to accomplish that which the ancient prophets had predicted.
Contrast Christ’s exalted understanding of Scripture with the prevailing attitude often exhibited among even professed Christians today. Entire denominations have come to deem the Bible as interesting but, basically, unreliable historical manuscripts. Everything-the six-day creation, the Exodus, even the bodily resurrection of Jesus (much less a literal Second Coming)-have been called into question, or even relegated to the status of myth.
The implications for discipleship are clear. Why would anyone want to give his or her life to a cause based on nothing but myths? Instead, people burdened with real problems need a real Savior. Otherwise, the gospel becomes a tarnished treasure or, metaphorically, plastic coinage covered with simulated gold. From a distance some might be fooled, but upon closer examination the plastic will suffer rejection. The only safe course is to follow Christ’s example of exalting, honoring, and obeying the Bible.
Death is no myth, is it? Nor is it just a symbol. It is one of the harshest realities that we all face. Think through the implications, then, of any view of the Bible that treats biblical teachings, such as the resurrection of Jesus or His Second Coming, as mere symbols or myth. Why must we, individually and as a church, never allow ourselves to get caught up in this satanic trap?
TuesdayDecember 31

Public Proclamation

Jesus attracted people to Himself in various settings, including public ones. Scripture assumed a prominent role in Christ’s public proclamations. Direct quotations and scriptural allusions filled His sermons and public discourse.
Read Matthew 5:17-39. In what ways do these verses show how Christ utilized Scripture for public ministry?


During Christ’s earthly sojourn, the ordinary Israelites’ relationship with Scripture was apparently highly legalistic. They looked to Scripture for regulations and ethical guidance. Upright behavior was considered the payment for eternal bliss. Jesus, however, overturned their legalistic notions and substituted heart-based religion for a system of external controls.
Christ-centered religion is rooted in a heart transformation that leads to ethical behavior. Ironically, some of the Pharisees had bypassed having a living relationship with God in their haste to achieve moral perfection. Jesus identified these shortcomings, and as a cure He beckoned listeners to accept Him as Savior and Master. With Jesus as the internally controlling force, behavioral standards were not lowered but elevated. All one has to do is read the Sermon on the Mount to see just how elevated His moral standards were.
As something strange and new, these words fall upon the ears of the wondering multitude. Such teaching is contrary to all they have ever heard from priest or rabbi. They see in it nothing to flatter their pride or to feed their ambitious hopes. But there is about this new Teacher a power that holds them spellbound. The sweetness of divine love flows from His very presence as the fragrance from a flower. . . . All feel instinctively that here is One who reads the secrets of the soul, yet who comes near to them with tender compassion.-Ellen G. White, Thoughts From the Mount of Blessing, p. 6.
It’s easier than we think to be legalistic, judgmental, and condemnatory, isn’t it? How can we protect ourselves from falling into these common practices?

WednesdayJanuary 1

Personal Ministry

Examples of Christ’s public ministry abound. Equally fascinating are Christ’s personal encounters, both with ordinary and elite members of society. These stories offer unique insights into the centrality of Scripture in Christ’s ministry.
Read John 13:18-20 and Luke 10:25-2824:13-32. What role did Scripture play in these passages? What purpose did Jesus have for quoting these particular verses? What resulted from these small group encounters with Scripture?


Repeatedly Christ quotes Scripture in conjunction with His calls to discipleship. This clearly implies that Jesus’ authority and credibility rested on Scripture, not merely on personal charisma. This is seen especially in the ways in which Jesus used the Scriptures as He worked with two disciples who were on the road to Emmaus.
“Beginning at Moses, the very Alpha of Bible history, Christ expounded in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself. Had He first made Himself known to them, their hearts would have been satisfied. In the fullness of their joy they would have hungered for nothing more. But it was necessary for them to understand the witness borne to Him by the types and prophecies of the Old Testament. Upon these their faith must be established. Christ performed no miracle to convince them, but it was His first work to explain the Scriptures. They had looked upon His death as the destruction of all their hopes. Now He showed from the prophets that this was the very strongest evidence for their faith.
In teaching these disciples, Jesus showed the importance of the Old Testament as a witness to His mission.-Ellen G. White, The Desire of Ages, pp. 796-799.
Dwell on Luke 24:32, especially the phrase that their heart[s] burn[ed] within. What does that mean? When was the last time your heart burned within you over the truths that we have been given? If it hasn’t in a long time, might it be because your heart has grown cold? If so, how can you change?

ThursdayJanuary 2

The Next Generation

Without doubt, as we have seen, Jesus places a heavy emphasis on the Bible. Never did He question the authority, veracity, or authenticity of a single Bible text. And yet, through the centuries, and even today, many people do just that.
Read Matthew 12:15-21Mark 1:1-3Acts 1:16-203:22-24; and Romans 10:10-11. What do these texts tells us about the ways in which the earliest Christians viewed Scripture? What lessons can we take from them for ourselves and how we relate to the Bible?


The earliest Christian writers continued the practice of using Scripture to authenticate the messiahship of Jesus of Nazareth. In effect they were saying that Christianity was inextricably connected to God’s self-revelation through the Hebrew Scriptures.
Jesus Himself had appealed to these sacred writings. Now Christ’s disciples were doing the same. Appeals to personal experience, miracles, and other witnesses for Christ were important and had their place; obviously, nothing, however, supplanted Scripture as the primary witness for Jesus.
Christ’s earliest followers sought guidance from Scripture concerning the church’s mission, its everyday practices, and its spiritual discipline. Human speculation and guesswork were minimized; Scripture became preeminent. Prayerful consideration of God’s revelation was evident in church councils (see Acts 15). Scripture touched every facet of the life of the early church.
How foolish would it be then for us, especially at the end of time, to have any other attitude toward the Bible?
How can we all learn to make the Bible central to our faith and use it to point us to Jesus? What are practical ways in which we can allow the teaching of the Bible to truly impact how we live and how we relate to others?

FridayJanuary 3
Christ in His ministry had opened the minds of His disciples to these prophecies. . . . Peter in preaching Christ had produced his evidence from the Old Testament. Stephen had pursued the same course. And Paul also in his ministry appealed to the scriptures foretelling the birth, sufferings, death, resurrection, and ascension of Christ. By the inspired testimony of Moses and the prophets he clearly proved the identity of Jesus of Nazareth with the Messiah and showed that from the days of Adam it was the voice of Christ which had been speaking through patriarchs and prophets.-Ellen G. White, The Acts of the Apostles, pp. 221, 222.

Discussion Questions:

  1. What are some practical ways in which you can incorporate Scripture into your daily routine? How can you use the Bible in your personal witnessing?
  2. How dependent on Scripture must today’s Christians become? Evaluate the importance of Scripture in your church’s life regarding the establishment of priorities, the channeling of resources, and faithfulness to mission.
  3. Dwell on the fact that we have no indication in the Bible of any Bible writers ever calling into question the veracity or authenticity of any other texts. Why should that be so important to us, today, at a time when so many people, including many Bible scholars, seem to have made it their first priority to challenge the truth of the Bible at every level?

Produced by the General Conference Office of Adventist Mission.  email:  info@adventistmission.org   website: www.adventistmission.org

Friday, December 20, 2013

Some Reflections on GYC Adventist Today

Home > Opinion > Z - Archived Bloggers & Columnists > Cork, Bill > 
.
Some Reflections on GYC
.
Submitted: Mar 9, 2011

I've been hearing about GYC (Generation of Youth for Christ) for several years. At the end of this year I'll have a chance to finally experience it firsthand, when GYC comes to Houston.

I did experience a regional variant in 2007 when I attended part of the Great Lakes Youth Conference (GLYC), held on the campus of Andrews University. I was at Andrews for a very different event--a conference on the fiftieth anniversary of the book, Seventh-day Adventists Answer Questions on Doctrine. Throw out either set of initials, GYC or QOD, in a gathering of informed Adventists, and you get similar reactions.

Most of my ministry has been in the areas of young adult and campus ministry. I write on these subjects for Adventist Today. I serve on the North American Division advisories for young adult ministry and Adventist Christian Fellowship. And so I was interested when I saw the GLYC signs around the Andrews campus, and on that Sabbath I took advantage of breaks in the QOD program to head over to the gym where GLYC was meeting.

Though the conference was in a gymnasium, the Sabbath School and worship service were characterized by reverence and Adventist formality: suits and ties for the young men, dresses for the young women, traditional music accompanied by piano and strings, sermons exhorting the faithful to contend for the faith once delivered to the saints.

I met Sam Pipim for the first time that day, and ran into him again at the ABC the next day. We've seen each other a couple of times since, and have corresponded. I had heard much about him (from people with strong opinions), but found him a genial, kind pastor, with an enthusiasm for ministry with young people, and a love of the challenges of ministry on the secular university campus. I read his books later. The books that annoy some of my other friends. The books that they see as Jeremiads criticizing ideas and methods and institutions they hold dear.

Through this process of investigation and conversation, I felt a strange sense of déjà vu.

Though raised an Adventist, I left when I was 21, and a student at Atlantic Union College. I returned to the Adventist church four years ago. In my twenty four years away, I was active in what Adventists like to call "Sunday-keeping churches" (I'll write an article about that another time)--I joined the Catholic church, and did professional lay ministry for that church. I spent a couple of years as a campus minister at the Newman Center at University of California at Santa Barbara before being hired as the Director of Young Adult and Campus Ministry for the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston. I was in that position for nine years. I supervised a half dozen Newman Centers. I served on the board of the National Association of Diocesan Directors of Campus Ministry. I was active in the Catholic Campus Ministry Association, helping to plan national and regional conferences.

In the Adventist conversations about GYC, I have heard echoes of conversations I heard in Catholic circles. The topic was the same: the relationship between "official" ministries and new "independent" ministries. The Catholic Church has a 100+ year history of ministry on secular college campuses. At places like University of Illinois, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Texas A&M, or University of Texas, the ministries attract hundreds, even thousands of students; they are served by with large staffs who work out of impressive facilities (with equally impressive budgets to pay for it all--my budget was $800,000, and we did no fundraising). Some of these ministries are run by dioceses (the equivalent of Adventist conferences), and others are run by religious orders (the Paulists and the Dominicans in particular).

In recent years, some new ministries have emerged, disturbing the status quo. One of the most prominent is FOCUS (the Fellowship of Catholic University Students). Another was College COMPASS (run by the priestly order, the Legion of Christ, and its lay movement, Regnum Christi). Though it isn't a campus ministry, Opus Dei maintains houses near some university campuses (including Rice and Harvard), and has retreats and classes for students.

In the Catholic context, the established ministries frequently see these new movements as a threat. Partly it's a matter of defending turf. "We are ‘official,' we have been here a long time, who are you to invade our territory?" There is a theological and methodological element to the tension, too. These new movements are conservative. Many of the established ministries (especially those run by the Paulists) are liberal. Some established ministries have been famous for their theological and liturgical innovation. Even when the new ministries do not explicitly criticize these liberal established ministries, the fact that they present traditional teaching and practice unapologetically is perceived as a criticism by those who advocate a "broader" more "balanced" perspective.

There's also a generational component. The older ministries are run by aging Baby Boomers, and these ministries often attract Boomers who have no connection to the university that the ministry serves. The music and liturgy and teaching appeal to those who were in college in the 60s and 70s.

Today's college students may be postmodern, and may reject much of traditional Christian teaching and practice--but, unlike the stereotypical Boomer, many also have an affinity for tradition. In a replay of the ‘80s television comedy, "Family Ties," the flower children have children who embrace what their parents rejected. And this cuts across religious boundaries. Younger Jews want Hebrew in the service, they are intrigued by tefillin and tallit and the mikvah. Young Catholics want the mass in Latin, and to pray the rosary. Young Protestants are re-embracing Calvin.

Are we seeing the same dynamics in Adventism, in our discussions over GYC? Are the older readers of Adventist Today and Spectrum shocked that young Adventists would embrace pre-Couperus Adventism? That they have a greater affinity for the Adventism of W. H. Branson than for that of Roy Branson? Do these older Adventists feel threatened by a movement that transcends the institutional church (ironic, given their criticism of the institution)? Or are they concerned more by its unapologetic embrace of Adventist teachings they find uncomfortable? Are they stung by the implied (and sometimes explicit) criticism of things they value? Are they embarrassed by its evangelistic zeal?

One of the things I saw in the Catholic discussions was that few on either side were actually talking about any of this with folks on the other side. I found myself, in my diocese and in my national roles, bringing people together from both sides to talk, and to listen, and to work together. When I was asked to organize a regional conference of the Catholic Campus Ministry Association in Houston, I invited representatives of Opus Dei, College COMPASS and FOCUS to give presentations, and to engage in conversation with other campus ministers. Our keynote speaker was Colleen Carroll Campbell, author of The New Faithful: Why Young Adults Are Embracing Christian Orthodoxy (Loyola 2002). Campus ministers came from other regions just to be part of this--some of the most liberal came just for the opportunity to be challenged.

Adventists need to facilitate this type of conversation between our factions. That's what we had at the QOD conference in 2007. That was a moment of grace only possible because some young theologians dared to do what a prior generation couldn't dream of--they invited folks to come and reason together. Some in official positions expressed nervousness at the idea, wondering aloud whether any good could come of it. But those of us were there saw the grace. I think of a wonderful lunchtime conversation I had with Dave Larson and the Standish brothers. I think of one of the Standishes and George Knight embracing in tears at the communion table.

So, let's start the conversation about GYC anew. Let's try to get to know them, and understand what drives them.

Start with Sam Pipim's history, which you'll find here. Yes, GYC owes its origins to young people who were blessed by the Michigan Conference's ministry to public university campuses. Yes, it got some funding from ASI. Yes, it is "conservative" by any definition of the term. Yes, there has been tension between GYC and the NAD and the GC (especially with overzealous trademark lawyers who, ignorant of the historic Adventist and Methodist use of the term, "general conference," insisted they change their name from General Youth Conference to Generation of Youth for Christ).

What I like best about Sam's history is that he is disarmingly candid. He cites some very blunt criticisms made by young GYC leaders towards GC leadership and mainstream Adventist youth ministry. He comes across as a moderating force, urging the young leaders to adopt more charitable views of church leaders. Following one particular tense episode, GYC and the GC/NAD youth ministry folks hammered out an agreement on how they could best work together. Yes, there have been growing pains, but GYC has grown and matured.

Justin McNeilus is the current president and chairman of the board of GYC. A graduate of Southern Adventist University, he's a vice president of Sterling State Bank in Minnesota (the family business, owned by his dad and uncle). Since I learned that GYC was coming to my city, I've been in touch with Justin, discussing some questions and concerns, as well as some hopes.

My first question as a pastor in Houston was whether they'd been in touch with our local conferences (Texas Conference and Southwest Regional Conference). He assured me that they had, in keeping with the agreement GYC had signed about four years ago with the NAD/GC (unfortunately, these conversations took place only after they had signed the contract and publicized the location).

He told me they would like to meet with pastors in Houston, especially as they plan for the outreach day that is part of each GYC. In some places that has taken the form of distributing literature or Bible study invitations, elsewhere the attendees have participated in health expos or depression seminars.

I asked if they had any statistics on who attends. Are they really the young adults they are trying to reach? In Baltimore, he said, 7,000 people attended on Sabbath--of those, 5,150 had registered (meetings on Sabbath are typically open to the community). Justin said, "Our target audience is 18 - 35. So of the 5,150 - 6.7% were above the target and 17.3% were below. The balance hit our target."

I had a number of other questions some have raised about an alleged legalistic emphasis in sermons at GYC, whether attendees were mainly from Adventist or non-Adventist schools, etc., but because of the press of time or lack of data he wasn't able to address many of my questions. So I can't say all my questions are answered. But I know these questions will only be answered as we are in direct conversation with one another. So, yes, I'll go when it is in Houston (and I hope GYC invites some local pastors to present some of the seminars).

But as I think about all of this, and all of the questions and controversy, one thing stands out. It was back in the 1890s that Ellen White first urged the Seventh-day Adventist church to take an interest in ministry to students at secular colleges and universities. She first made that call in Ann Arbor--and today, the Michigan Conference remains the conference that has most taken that call to heart. It was a century late, but in 1998 it started its office of public campus ministry. It gave birth to CAMPUS, a ministry to students at secular colleges. CAMPUS has spread to many other states--and it, in turn, gave birth to GYC.

If anyone in the General Conference, North American Division, union conference or local conference is concerned about GYC, they need to do more than complain. They need to do themselves the work that CAMPUS is doing. They need to identify individuals who have passion and preparation for ministry on secular college campuses and equip them with the resources they need to be viable and effective. They need to identify the major colleges and universities in each conference, and develop a plan for reaching them. They need to insist that local churches near college campuses make outreach to that campus a priority, and the conferences need to underscore that priority by placing pastors in these churches with the right vision and temperament for the ministry.

Campus ministry is a form of evangelism. It needs evangelists. It needs evangelism dollars. If we are not going to provide them, we dare not criticize GYC or CAMPUS when they say, "Here am I Lord, send me!"