Thursday, October 13, 2016

Lesson 4 God and Human Suffering Oct 15-21 2016

Lesson 4October 15–21

God and Human Suffering


Sabbath Afternoon
Memory Text: “‘Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about its own things. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble’” (Matthew 6:34, NKJV).
Unlike every other book of the Bible, the book of Job is completely removed from the context of the land and people of Israel. From Genesis, with the promise to Abram that the Lord will “make of thee a great nation” (Gen. 12:2), to Revelation, which describes “the holy city,” Jerusalem (Rev. 22:19), in some way, directly or indirectly, the context of Israel and its covenant relationship with God helps shape each book.
In Job there is nothing of that, not even the seminal event in ancient Israelite history, the Exodus. The most immediate reason is that Moses wrote Job in Midian, along with Genesis (see also The SDA Bible Commentary, vol. 3, p. 1140); the Exodus had not happened yet, which explains why it’s not mentioned.
But perhaps there’s another reason, even more important. One of the key themes of Job, human suffering, is universal. It’s not limited to any one people or time. Jew or Gentile, we all know something of Job’s woes, of the pain of existence in a fallen world. However unique his pain, Job represents us all in our sufferings.
Study this week’s lesson to prepare for Sabbath, October 22.
SundayOctober 16

God in Nature

Read Romans 1:18–20. What is Paul saying here?

What a powerful few sentences. Enough of the reality and existence of God is revealed through “what has been made” (NASB), that is, through the created world, that people will be “without excuse” (NASB) for their unbelief. Paul is saying that from the creation alone humans can learn enough about the existence and nature of God that they can justly be condemned on the day of judgment.
No question, the natural world does reveal so much to us about the existence of God. Modern science, too, has revealed to us details about the marvels of Creation that our ancestors, even just 300 years ago, much less 3,000 years ago, could not even have begun to imagine. There’s an interesting irony here, as well: the more complexity science finds in life, the less likely becomes the means science claims for its origin, that of accident and chance. An iPhone, for instance, which looks designed, acts designed, reveals design both inside and out, and works only through design is, of course, designed. But a human being, which looks designed, acts designed, reveals design both inside and out, and works only through design is, we are assured, a product of pure chance alone. Sadly, many people are deceived into believing such claims.
Read Job 12:7–10. How do the words here reflect the idea presented in Romans 1:18–20?

Here, too, we are told that the reality of God is seen in the created world. Though especially in its fallen state, nature doesn’t reveal the full character of God, it certainly reveals His creative power and aspects of His goodness, as well.
What things in nature especially talk to you about the power and goodness of God? How can you learn to draw strength and encouragement from the message it gives you?
MondayOctober 17

Nothing Came From Itself

There are many good and powerful arguments in favor of God’s existence. Besides the testimony of the created world, there’s also what’s called the “cosmological” argument. Basically, it’s the idea that nothing came from itself and that nothing created itself. Instead, what was created was created by something else before it, and whatever created that had to be created by something else before it. And this goes on and on until we stop at something uncreated, something that had always existed, something that never was not in existence. And who else would that be but the God depicted in Scripture?
What do the following texts teach us about the origin of all things?



These texts teach what is really the most logical explanation for the Creation—an eternally existing God. Some thinkers, utterly opposed to the idea of God, have come up with an alternative suggestion. Instead of an all-powerful and eternal God creating the universe, we are told that “nothing” created it. Even such a famous scientist as Stephen Hawking, who now occupies the chair that Isaac Newton once held, argues that “nothing” created the universe.
“Because there is a law like gravity the universe can and will create itself from nothing.”—Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow,The Grand Design (New York: Random House, 2010), p. 180.
Though Hawking surely has plenty of deep and complicated math to describe his idea, one has to wonder: here we are, a good 400 years since the beginning of the scientific revolution, and one of the world’s best scientists is arguing that the universe and all that’s in it came from nothing? Error is error, even when spoken by a great scientist.
In this context, read 1 Corinthians 3:19. Why is it always so important for Christians to keep this important truth before us?
TuesdayOctober 18

The Earliest of Books

Despite the hype of those who don’t believe in God, those who believe in God have many good reasons for their belief. However, there’s been one perennial problem that many have used through the ages to justify their disbelief, and that is the problem of human suffering and evil. How can God be all-good, all-loving, and all-powerful, and evil exist? This has been and remains a stumbling block to many. And also, if we are honest, what believer in God, what person who has tasted and experienced the reality of God and His love hasn’t struggled at times with that question?
How interesting, then, that Ellen G. White also taught what Jewish tradition teaches: that Moses wrote Job in Midian. “The long years amid desert solitudes were not lost. Not only was Moses gaining a preparation for the great work before him, but during this time, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, he wrote the book of Genesis and also the book of Job, which would be read with the deepest interest by the people of God until the close of time.”—Ellen G. White Comments, The SDA Bible Commentary, vol. 3, p. 1140.
What this tells us is that of the first two books of the Bible ever penned, one of them, Job, deals with the universal issue of human pain and suffering. That is, God knew that this would be a big question for humans, and thus, right from the start, in the Word, He had Moses pen the story of Job. God let us know, early on, that we are not left alone in our pain and suffering but that He is there, He knows all about it, and we can have the hope that He will make it right in the end.
What do the following texts teach us about the reality of evil? Matt. 6:34John 16:33Dan. 12:1Matt. 24:7.

However understandable the argument from evil against the existence of God, in light of the Scriptures, it makes no sense. Though the Bible teaches the reality of an all-knowing, all-powerful, all-loving God, it also teaches the reality of evil, of human suffering, and woe. Evil is not an excuse to disbelieve in God. In fact, a cursory reading of the book of Job shows that even amid his utter despondency, Job never questioned the existence of God. The question instead, and a valid one, is why are these things happening to him?
It’s only natural to have questions about the evil we see. How can we learn to trust in the goodness of God despite that evil?
WednesdayOctober 19

The Dilemma

Read the following texts in Job. What issue is Job wrestling with? What question does he not ask? Job 6:4–8Job 9:1–12.

As stated in yesterday’s study, the issue of God’s existence never came up in the book of Job. Instead, the question was why was Job going through these trials? And, considering all that happened to him, it certainly was a fair question, especially because he believed in God.
If, for example, someone was an atheist and trials were to come, the answer about why could be relatively simple and straightforward to him or her. We live in a meaningless and purposeless world that cares nothing about us. Thus, amid the harsh and cold and uncaring natural forces around us, we sometimes are the victims of trials that serve no purpose. How could they? If life itself serves no purpose, then the trials that accompany that life must be just as meaningless.
While many might find this answer unsatisfying and hopeless, it certainly makes sense given the premise, which is that there is no God. On the other hand, for someone like Job, the dilemma is different.
Read Job 10:8–12. How do these texts help us understand the terrible questions that Job is wrestling with?

Yes, the question that Job is wrestling with is the same one that most believers in God have wrestled with and still do wrestle with: If God exists, a good and loving God, why do humans suffer the things that they do? Why do even “good” people, such as Job, go through calamities and trials that so often seem to produce nothing of value? Again, if the universe were godless, the answer would be that this is simply what it means to live in a purely materialistic cosmos in which human beings are merely the accidental by-products of atoms and molecules.
Job knew better than that. We do too; hence, the dilemma.
ThursdayOctober 20

Theodicy

Read Romans 3:1–4. Though the immediate context is the unfaithfulness of some of God’s covenant people, what is the bigger issue that Paul is talking about here? What is Paul saying about God?

Quoting Psalm 51:4, Paul talks about how the Lord Himself will “be justified in your words and will prevail when you are judged”(Rom. 3:4, NET). The idea being presented is a motif that appears in various places in the Scriptures. It’s called theodicy, and it is the question of understanding the goodness of God in the face of evil. It’s the age-old question that we have been looking at all week. In fact, the whole great controversy itself is really a theodicy. Before humans, before angels, before the whole universe, the goodness of God will be revealed despite the evil that unfolds in the world.
“Every question of truth and error in the long-standing controversy has now been made plain. The results of rebellion, the fruits of setting aside the divine statutes, have been laid open to the view of all created intelligences. The working out of Satan's rule in contrast with the government of God has been presented to the whole universe. Satan’s own works have condemned him. God’s wisdom, His justice, and His goodness stand fully vindicated. It is seen that all His dealings in the great controversy have been conducted with respect to the eternal good of His people and the good of all the worlds that He has created.”—Ellen G. White, The Great Controversy, pp. 670, 671.
However hard it might be for us now to understand, immersed as we are in a world of sin and suffering (and if it’s hard for us, imagine what Job must have thought), when it is all over we will be able to see the goodness and justice and love and fairness of God in all His dealings with humanity, with Satan, and with sin. This doesn’t mean that everything that happens in the world is good; clearly it’s not. It means only that God is dealing with it in the best way possible, and then when this terrible experience with sin is over, we will be able to shout: “‘Great and marvelous are Your works, Lord God Almighty! Just and true are Your ways, O King of the saints!’” (Rev. 15:3, NKJV).
Why is it so important to be praising God, even now, even amid the trials that seem so hard to bear?
FridayOctober 21
Further Thought: Christian writer and apologist C. S. Lewis wrote a book talking about the death of his wife and his struggle to come to terms with that death. In it he wrote:
“Not that I am (I think) in much danger of ceasing to believe in God. The real danger is of coming to believe such dreadful things about Him. The conclusion I dread is not ‘So there’s no God after all,’ but ‘So this is what God’s really like. Deceive yourself no longer.’”—A Grief Observed (San Francisco: Harper San Francisco, 1996), pp. 6, 7. This, too, is the question that Job himself struggled with. As we saw, he never doubted God’s existence; what he struggled with was the question of the character of God. Job had faithfully served the Lord. Job had been a “good” man. Therefore he knew that he did not deserve the things that were happening to him. Thus, he was asking the question that so many people who believe in God ask amid tragedies: What is God really like? And is this not what the great controversy is really about? The question is not about God’s existence but about His character. And though so much is involved in resolving the great controversy, there’s no question that the death of Jesus on the cross, where the Son of God had “given Himself for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweet-smelling aroma” (Eph. 5:2, NKJV), more than anything else revealed to the cosmos the true character of our Creator. The Cross shows us that God is a God whom we can all trust.

Discussion Questions:

  1. Dwell on the question of suffering for those who don’t believe in God. As we saw, they don’t have to struggle with the same questions that believers in God do when facing tragedy. On the other hand, what hope can they have of ever getting answers, of ever finding resolution? Imagine going through all that we go through here in this world and then to believe that it all ends in the grave, with nothing beyond. No wonder so many unbelievers despair of life or of even finding any meaning to life. Secular literature is filled with their exclamations and protests about how meaningless it all is. How can we, then, even amid our sorrows here, draw hope from our faith, despite the difficult questions that remain?
  2. Why is it so important for us, right now, to dwell on the Cross, the most powerful revelation we have of God’s love and of what God is like? When we are engulfed by sorrow, by tragedy, by inexplicable evil, what does the Cross tell us about the character of God? When we keep the reality of the Cross always before us, what hope can we draw for ourselves for the ultimate outcome of whatever we face now?
Inside Story~  Inter-European Division

Filling the Emptiness, Part 2

After several weeks of deception, Elena realized that she was telling lies in order to worship God, and that wouldn't be acceptable to Him. She decided to be truthful and accept the consequences.
But her father already suspected what she was doing. He watched her enter the widow's house, then leave a half hour later. He went next door and asked for his daughter. The widow told him she had left, but she would return in a half hour. But that night Elena was so deeply touched as the speaker described how Jesus suffered for humanity that she couldn't tear herself away before the service ended.
On her way home she thought, If God suffered so much for me, maybe I will have to suffer for Him, too. I will be faithful and look to Jesus for strength. She had no idea how soon her suffering would begin.
She returned to the widow's home overjoyed by what she had heard. But the widow warned her, "Be careful; your father is angry."
She found her father waiting for her at home. He yelled at her, demanding to know where she had been.
"I've been at the church," she said. "I liked it very much."
"You won't go to that church again!" he yelled. "You will have nothing to do with Adventists ever again!" He went to her room and gathered all her religious books and tore them up. Then he threw them on a pile in the yard and burned them.
Her father tried every means he knew to convince Elena to stop this "nonsense." But Elena had seen God's better way and refused to disobey Him. When she told her father this, he shouted, "I would rather kill you than have a daughter who disobeys me! You are no longer my daughter!"
"OK," she said. "If you won't let me be your daughter, then I will be the daughter of God!"
One Sabbath Elena awoke and found everyone sleeping. She decided to go to church in spite of her father's threats to beat her. As she prepared to leave the house, he saw her. "Where are you going?" he asked.
"To the Adventist church," she answered.
"OK," he said calmly. "But don't stay long."
Later, Elena's father saw her come home and asked, "Who said you could go to the church?"
"You did," Elena said.
"When?" he asked, confused.
"This morning. Don't you remember?"
The tension between Elena and her father made it difficult for her to remain in the home. But Elena had nowhere else to go.
To be continued.

Produced by the General Conference Office of Adventist Mission.  email: info@adventistmission.org  website: www.adventistmission.org



Vote to encourage adherence. Oct 11,2016

Annual Council approves measure to encourage adherence to church policies

The vote takes place after 50 delegates share their viewpoints.

Annual Council approves measure to encourage adherence to church policies
Ballots getting counted in front of the Seventh-day Adventist church's Exectutive Committee. (Brent Hardinge / ANN)
Annual Council delegates approved on Tuesday a document that details steps on how to deal with Seventh-day Adventist Church entities not adhering to voted actions of the Adventist world church.
The one-year process, which several delegates described as conciliatory in approach, envisages multiple consultations at various levels of the church’s structure, pastoral letters urging compliance with voted church actions, and much prayer. If the matter relates to Fundamental Beliefs or voted actions and policies of the world church and remains unresolved, the next step of action is to take place. The document calls for the General Conference Administrative Committee to draft a proposal on the next course of action and submit it to the 2017 Annual Council for approval.
“We will work with diligence to bring a good dialogue and discussion,” world church president Ted N.C. Wilson said after the vote. 
“The Lord is not going to let this church falter,” he said.  “This church will move ahead with mission.” 
The Tuesday evening vote capped a nearly three-hour discussion about the document, titled “Unity in Mission: Procedures in Church Reconciliation,” in the auditorium of the Adventist Church’s headquarters in Silver Spring, Maryland. A total of 315 delegates representing 19.5 million church members in more than 200 countries and territories are gathered in Maryland for the yearly business meetings of the General Conference Executive Committee, the highest decision-making authority in the world church after the General Conference Session, which is held every five years. A total of 292 delegates participated in the vote. 
Michael Ryan, an assistant to the General Conference president who was involved in the development of the document, explained to delegates at the beginning of Tuesday’s discussion and again partway through that the “Unity in Mission” document was not about women’s ordination. Instead, he said, it was about making sure that all church entities followed world church policy. This, in turn, would keep the church united and help it fulfill its mission of spreading the gospel to the world, Ryan said. 
“What we have here is a document responding to the call that we enter into a time of discussion and listening on the issues that might be before us on non-compliance,” Ryan said. “This document is not about women’s ordination, [although] it certainly will be one of the tests.” 
The 2015 General Conference Session turned down a proposal that would have allowed some regions of the church to ordain women to pastoral ministry. A few of the church’s administrative fields, however, have ordained women.
Many of the 50 people who stood to speak expressed concern with the statement. Of that 50, some were “invitees” who only had voice but no vote. Several expressed concerns about the scope of the potential matters that could be addressed, including commonly accepted variations from working policy. Others, seeing Tuesday’s action as a follow-up to the San Antonio General Session action, said the matter for them was of one of conscience, not of salvation. Several said they feared the document would split the church rather than unify it. 
Daniel Jackson, president of the North American Division, said he has spoken and prayed with entities within his territory, as the document says, and did not see how the document would contribute to church unity. He said the question that delegates ultimately would have to ask themselves if they approved the document was simple: “Has this decision contributed to the unity of the church?”
Jiří Moskala, dean of the Seventh-day Adventist Seminary at Andrews University echoed several delegates in expressing his discomfort that the Fundamental Beliefs and voted actions and policies of the world church are seemingly being given equal footing in the document. He called for a theological study of how policy relates to the church’s core doctrinal beliefs. 
Some delegates said they felt the document had been rushed through to a vote and needed more study.
“We need more time with this document,” said Dave Weigley, president of the Columbia Union Conference within the North American Division. 
An early form of the document was drafted by Ryan together with church division presidents last summer.  Work began on the revised document Oct. 3. 
A light moment came when world church general vice president Tom Lemon, who chaired the session, announced that the next delegate speaking would be William Miller. The audience laughed that the president of the Potomac Conference shares the same name as the Advent movement’s founding preacher. 
Joining in the joke, Miller quipped, “Hopefully this will not be a Great Disappointment. 
Delegates who supported the document said the points being raised by the other delegates were off topic and at one point asked the chair, world church general vice president Tom Lemon, for clarification. They said the issue was only whether entities of the world church needed to comply with decisions voted at General Conference Session. 
“I don't have the right to deviate from actions taken by the world church,” said Kathryn Proffitt, a lay delegate.
She said that no matter her personal views, she had to set them aside because of what the General Conference voted in Session.
Guillermo Biaggi, a general vice president of the world church, reiterated that a decision voted at General Conference Session has worldwide authority. 
“We must abide by this vote,” he said, referring to the 2015 Session vote.
He added that the document under discussion on Tuesday support mission, “even though some may think differently.”
In a room filled with differing viewpoints about the document, mission was the one point that everyone seemed to agree on. Delegates spoke passionately about their desire for all church leaders and members to be out in the field, spreading the gospel. 
“All of us here love the church,” said Jose Cortes, president of the New Jersey Conference, and the last delegate to speak shortly before 6 p.m.
He recalled his grandmother telling him when he became a pastor: “You belong to the church, and the church belongs to Jesus.”
He appealed to delegates to take those words to heart.
After more than two hours of comments from the floor, Lemon called for delegates to vote on paper ballots. Ushers collected the ballots and took them to the front of the auditorium, where world church secretary G.T. Ng and other members of his team counted them. 
Lemon said in an interview after the vote he appreciated the decorum and believed that the issue was well understood.
"The real work has just begun," he said.

Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Elder Devon St.Ive Tugman.

ELDER

DEVON ST. IVE TUGMAN



June 18, 1949 - October 1, 2016

Devon St. Ive Tugman, a longtime Middletown resident, passed away peacefully surrounded by his loving family on Saturday, October 1, 2016 following a short illness at home. He was 68.
The son of the late Johnny and Gwendolyn Williams Tugman, he was born on June 18, 1949 in Berrydale of Portland, Jamaica. Devon was the youngest son of 11 children and was a devoted, dependable and honest man throughout his life. He married Leonie Lindo on December 10, 1975. In 1980, Devon and Leonie moved to Middletown, NY from Kingston, Jamaica. Devon Tugman was the owner of D and L Jewelers in Hawley, PA. Devon was a dedicated member of Seventh Day Adventist Church in Middletown. He served in many capacities such as Head Elder, Chairman of the Middletown Seventh-day Adventist School Board and other pertinent positions. He was actively involved in his community, he worked in prison outreached and was helpful wherever he could be to others.
He is survived by his loving wife, Leonie; by his children, Keane Tugman of Clinton, MA, Dale Tugman of Middletown and Tara French and her husband, Mark of Henrietta, NY; his grandchildren, Jaela Tugman Morgan and Nathan French. He is also survived by his three brothers, Ruel, Leon and Lenox and his three sisters, Laura, Linda and June. As well as his many nieces and nephews .

Visitation will be held at the Seventh Day Adventist Church on 70 Highland Avenue, Middletown, NY on Sunday, October 16, 2016 from 2 to 4 and 6 to 8 p.m. Funeral Service will be held at 11 a.m. on Monday, October 17, 2016 at the Middletown Seventh day Adventist Church. Burial will follow at Hillside Cemetery in Middletown.
Memorial contributions in Devon's name may be made to the Seventh Day Adventist Church, 70 Highland Avenue, Middletown, NY 10940.

.

Friday, October 7, 2016

Lesson 3 Doth Job Fear God for Nought October 8-14 2016

Lesson 3October 8-14

"Doth Job Fear God for Nought?"

Sabbath Afternoon

Memory Text: "But he said to her, 'You speak as one of the foolish women speaks. Shall we indeed accept good from God, and shall we not accept adversity?' In all this Job did not sin with his lips" (Job 2:10, NKJV).
The book of Job opens up to us a whole new dimension of reality. It gives us a glimpse into the great controversy between Christ and Satan. And by doing so, it also provides us a template, a frame, an outline to help us better understand the world that we live in, a world that so often baffles, dazes, even frightens us with what it tosses our way. But the book of Job also shows that this great controversy is not merely someone else's fight, in that we have nothing to do with it. If only that were the case; unfortunately, it's not: " 'Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and the sea! For the devil has come down to you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has a short time' " (Rev. 12:12, NKJV). Satan has come down to the earth and to the sea, and we know for ourselves that his wrath is indeed great. Who among us, as flesh, hasn't felt that wrath?
This week we will continue to look at the first two chapters of Job as we seek to get a greater understanding of how we fit in as the great controversy continues to rage.
Study this week's lesson to prepare for Sabbath, October 15.
SundayOctober 9

God's Servant, Job

Read Job 1:1-22. Focus specifically on Satan's accusations against Job. What is Satan saying? What's implied in his attacks? Who, in the end, is Satan really attacking?

" 'Have You not made a hedge around him, around his household, and around all that he has on every side? You have blessed the work of his hands, and his possessions have increased in the land' " (Job 1:10, NKJV). The book of Job opens by referencing not only Job's righteousness and good character but also his material blessings and fruitful household. These were the specific things that helped make Job revered as "the greatest of all the men of the east" (Job 1:3, NASB). And these, too, are the specific things that Satan hurls in God's face, saying basically that only because You have done this for him does he serve You.
What, then, is implied in Satan's charge that if God were to take these things away from Job, Job would " 'surely curse You to Your face' " (Job 1:11, NKJV)? The attack, really, is an attack against God Himself. (This is what the whole great controversy is about anyway.) If God were so wonderful, so good, then Job would obey and fear and worship Him out of love and appreciation alone. After all, who wouldn't love a God who had done so much for him? In a sense, Satan was saying that God had all but bribed Job into being faithful to Him. Thus, he claimed, Job served God not out of love for God, but out of his own selfish motives.
Think about some of the most nasty and hateful political rulers who have faithful cronies loyal to the death because this ruler was good to them. If, in fact, the Lord really was the kind, loving, and caring God that He is portrayed to be, then even if Job lost all those good things, Job would still serve the Lord. By claiming, however, that Job wouldn't stay faithful, Satan insinuates that even Job doesn't fully trust Him and that Job is loyal only because of what God has given him. That is, in the end (according to Satan) Job's loyalty pretty much depends on whether it's a good business deal for him.
Why do you serve the Lord? Suppose your motives aren't perfect. If you had to wait until your motives were perfect (if they aren't), what might happen to you and your faith?
MondayOctober 10

Skin for Skin: The Battle Continues

Job 2:1-3 begins almost repeating some of Job 1:6-8. The big change is the last part of Job 2:3, where the Lord Himself talks about how faithful Job remained despite the calamities that befell him. Thus, by the time we get to Job 2:3, it looks as if Satan's accusations have been shown as false. Job stayed faithful to God and didn't curse Him, as Satan said he would.
Read Job 2:1-13. What happens in these texts? Also, what is the significance of the fact that in both Job 1 and 2 these "sons of God" are there to witness the dialogue between God and Satan?

The phrase "skin for skin" is an idiomatic expression that has baffled commentators. The idea, though, is this: let something happen to Job's own person, and that will cause him to show where his loyalty really is. Ruin Job's body, his health, and see what happens.
And interestingly enough, what happens does not happen in a vacuum either. Both instances of the controversy in heaven, as revealed here in the book of Job, take place in the context of some sort of meeting between these heavenly intelligences and God. Satan is making his accusations "publicly"; that is, he is doing it before these other beings. This idea fits in perfectly with what we know about the great controversy. It is something that is unfolding before the whole universe. (See 1 Cor. 4:9Dan. 7:10Rev. 12:7-9.)
"But the plan of redemption had a yet broader and deeper purpose than the salvation of man. It was not for this alone that Christ came to the earth; it was not merely that the inhabitants of this little world might regard the law of God as it should be regarded; but it was to vindicate the character of God before the universe. . . . The act of Christ in dying for the salvation of man would not only make heaven accessible to men, but before all the universe it would justify God and His Son in their dealing with the rebellion of Satan. It would establish the perpetuity of the law of God and would reveal the nature and the results of sin." - Ellen G. White, Patriarchs and Prophets, pp. 68, 69.
TuesdayOctober 11

Blessed Be the Name of the Lord

After Satan's first attack on Job, after the news came to him about all the calamities that befell him, how did Job respond? (See Job 1:20-22.) What is the significance of the fact that, even amid such tragedy, Job "sinned not, nor charged God foolishly"?

Central to God's government, a government based on love, is freedom of choice. God wants us to serve Him because we love Him, not because we are forced to serve Him. "Satan insinuated that Job served God from selfish motives. . . . He attempted to deny that true religion springs from love and an intelligent appreciation of God's character, that true worshipers love religion for its own sake-not for reward; that they serve God because such service is right in itself, and not merely because heaven is full of glory; and that they love God because He is worthy of their affection and confidence, and not merely because He blesses them."-The SDA Bible Commentary, vol. 3, p. 500.
In the book of Job, Job proved Satan's charges wrong. However, though God knew what would happen, Job still could have acted differently. He could have sinned, he could have "charged God foolishly." Job was not forced by God to act as he did. His steadfast faithfulness, considering the circumstances, was an amazing testimony before men and angels.
Compare what happened in Job 1 to what happened with Adam and Eve in Genesis 3:1-8. How does the contrast make their sin appear so terrible?

Adam and Eve, sinless beings amid a true paradise, transgressed and fell into sin because of Satan's attack; Job, amid utter pain and tragedy and ruin, stayed faithful to the Lord despite Satan's attacks. In both cases, we have a powerful example of the great issues at stake in regard to free will.
How does Job's reaction here show us how cheap, easy, and false our excuses for sin can often be?
WednesdayOctober 12

Job's Wife

This is probably as good time as any to deal with another victim in the story of Job: his wife. She appears only in Job 2:910. After that, she vanishes from the story and from history. We are told nothing more about her. However, considering all that happened, who could imagine the grief that this unfortunate woman went through? Her tragedy, that of her children and that of the other victims in chapter 1, show the universality of suffering. We are all involved in the great controversy; no one escapes.
Compare Job 2:3 to Job 2:9. What similar phrase is used both by God and Job's wife, and what is the importance of how they both use it?

It's no coincidence that the same phrase about his holding fast his "integrity" appears in both texts. The word translated "integrity" comes from the same word used in Job 1:1 and Job 1:8, often translated "blameless." The root word itself gives the idea of "completeness" and "fullness."
How unfortunate that Job's wife becomes someone who challenges Job on the very thing for which God commends him. In her grief, in her sorrow, she's pushing Job to do precisely what God says he won't do. Though we certainly can't judge her, what a lesson to us all about how careful we have to be in order not to be a stumbling block to others. (See Luke 17:2.)
Read Job 2:10. What powerful testimony does Job give here as well? See also Phil. 4:11-13.

Job reveals the genuineness of his faith. He is going to serve the Lord both in the good times and in the bad. What's fascinating, though, is that Satan now disappears from the story and doesn't appear again. And though the text doesn't mention it, we can imagine Satan's frustration and anger at Job's response. After all, look at how easily he took down Adam and Eve and so many others. The "accuser of our brethren" (Rev. 12:10was going to have to find someone else other than Job to accuse.
How do we learn to be faithful to God, both in the good times and in the bad?
ThursdayOctober 13

Obedience Unto Death

Job 1:22 reads: "In all this Job did not sin nor charge God with wrong" (NKJV)Job 2:10 reads: "In all this Job did not sin with his lips" (NKJV). In both cases, despite the attacks, Job stayed faithful to the Lord. Both texts stress the fact that Job did not sin, either with actions or with words.
Of course, the texts don't say that Job wasn't a sinner. They would never say that, because the Bible teaches that we are all sinners. "If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar, and His word is not in us" (1 John 1:10, NKJV). Being "blameless and upright," fearing God and shunning evil (Job 1:1, NKJV), does not make a person sinless. Like everyone else, Job was born in sin and needed a Savior.
Nevertheless, despite all that came upon him, he remained faithful to the Lord. In this sense, in his own way Job could be seen as a kind of symbol, a faint example of Jesus (see lesson 14), who, amid terrible trials and temptations, didn't give up, didn't fall into sin, and thus refuted Satan's charges against God. Of course, what Christ did was so much bigger, grander, and more consequential than what Job did. Nevertheless, the simple parallel remains.
Read Matthew 4:1-11. How did Job's experience reflect what happened here?

Though in a terrible environment, His body weakened by lack of food, Jesus in His humanity, in "the likeness of sinful flesh" (Rom. 8:3), did not do what the devil wanted Him to do, just as Job didn't either. And also just as Satan disappeared from the scene after Job stayed faithful, after Jesus resisted Satan's last effort against Him, Scripture said that "the devil left Him" (Matt. 4:11, NKJV; see alsoJames 4:7).
Yet, what Jesus faced in the wilderness was only the start. His real test would come at the cross, and here, too, despite everything thrown at Him (even worse than what Job faced) Jesus stayed faithful, even unto death.
Read Philippians 2:5-8. What hope does Christ's "obedience unto death" offer us, and what does it tell us about how we should live in response to His obedience?
FridayOctober 14
Further Thought: Students of the book of Job who delve into the Hebrew come across an interesting phenomenon. Job's wife's words to him are translated, " 'Curse God and die' " (Job 2:9, NKJV)Job 1:5 is translated: " 'it may be that my sons have sinned andcursed God in their hearts' "(NKJV). And Job 1:11 is translated: " 'But now, stretch out Your hand and touch all that he has, and he will surely curse You to Your face!' " (NKJV). In each case, however, the word translated "curse" comes from a word that means "bless." The word, from the root brk, is used all through the Bible for "bless." It's the same root used in Genesis 1:22, when God "blessed" the creatures He had made. The same root is used in Psalm 66:8, "Oh, bless our God, you peoples!" (NKJV).
Why, then, is the same verb, which means "bless," translated as "curse" in these few texts? First of all, if the idea of "blessed" were meant in those texts in Job, the texts would be nonsensical. In Job 1:5, why would Job want to offer sacrifices to God in case his sons had "blessed" God in their hearts? The context demands a different meaning. The same with Job 1:11 and Job 2:5. Why would Satan think that if calamity befell Job, he would bless God? The context demands that the meaning be "curse" instead. Also, why would Job rebuke his wife for telling him to bless God (Job 2:910)? Given the context, the text makes sense only if the idea of "curse" is meant.
Why, then, did not the author use one of the common words for "curse"? Scholars believe that it's a euphemism, because the idea of writing down the concept of cursing God was offensive to the author's religious sensibilities (we can see the same thing in 1 Kings 21:1013, where the word translated "blaspheme" is from brk, "bless"). So, Moses used the word "bless" instead of the actual word for "curse," even though it's obvious that the idea of curse was intended.

Discussion Questions:

  1. In times of crisis, why is it so natural for people to question the reality of God or to question what God is like? Amid the harsh reality of what it means to live in a fallen world, a world in which the great controversy is real, why must we keep the reality of the Cross always before us?
  2. Though we know the background to what was going on in the story of Job, as far as we can tell, Job didn't know it. All he knew were the calamities that befell him. He didn't know the bigger picture. What should this tell us about how, amid trials, we need to remember that there's a bigger picture that we often don't see or understand, and how can we learn to draw comfort from this realization?
Inside Story~  Inter-European Division

Filling the Emptiness, Part 1

As the youngest child in a Romanian family and the only daughter, Elena was showered with love. Yet she felt an emptiness deep inside, but she didn't know what it was. Her friends invited her to join them at the disco, where she could fill her emptiness with music and dancing, but her parents forbade her to go.
One of Elena's friends invited her to visit the Adventist church. Elena had heard that Adventists were good and honest people. But her grandmother warned her that faithful Orthodox members don't go inside Protestant churches. So Elena didn't go.
Then someone invited Elena to attend a Week of Prayer series. These meetings aren't regular worship services, she reasoned, so there can be no harm in going. Her father gave her permission to go, so she went, partly out of curiosity about what other churches teach. She attended every meeting, and for the first time in her life she learned that Jesus wants to be her personal friend, that He loves her, died for her, and is coming again. For the first time in her life Elena felt happiness. She wanted to hear more and decided to attend the church on Saturday.
When Elena's father realized that she now wanted to attend worship services on Sabbath, he was angry. But Elena had tasted the love of Christ and knew that she must learn more. However, when she tried to leave home to go to the church, her father stopped her. "This family has only one religion," he said. "No one in this house will bring in any other religion."
But as Elena read her Bible and learned other truths she hadn't known, she decided that Saturday is God's Sabbath. She wanted to attend church, but she knew her parents wouldn't allow her to go. So she told them that she was going to visit her grandmother. On her way to church she stopped in at her grandmother's for a few minutes then went on to church. Her grandmother knew what Elena was doing and warned her that it would bring sadness to the family.
A widow lived next door to Elena's family. She had heard of Elena's desire to attend church. She invited Elena to come to her house on Friday afternoons so she could slip off to church for the evening vespers program. Elena was careful to leave church early, so she wouldn't be seen walking with Adventists.
To be continued.

Produced by the General Conference Office of Adventist Mission.  email: info@adventistmission.org  website: www.adventistmission.org